Prevalence, risk factors, and main characteristics of bruises in cattle: A meta-analysis in the American continent A systematic review and meta-analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Bruises threaten the welfare of cattle because they cause pain, suffering, and stress during the pre-slaughter stage. Thus, we used meta-analyses to estimate the prevalence of carcass bruising in cattle from the American continent, determined the characteristics of the bruises, and calculated the odds ratio (OR) of risk factor categories associated with bruising. We searched electronic databases to retrieve primary studies conducted in the American continent, which reported cattle carcass bruising, analyzed the size, location, shape, and age of the bruises, and assessed risk factors for bruising. We included 46 studies from nine countries comprising 928 447 cattle carcasses with an overall prevalence of 59.5 % (95 % CI: 51.9 – 66-9) and 2.9 (range 3.4 – 7.4) bruises per carcass in average. The prevalence doubled from 30.7 % during 1991 – 2000 to 64.2 % during 2011 – 2020. Fresh, small-sized bruises of the lowest severity and located mainly in the hindquarter were highly prevalent (37.5 – 66.4 %). The removed meat due to bruising ranged 0.11 – 1.12 kg/carcass with an accumulated weight of condemned meat between 15.6 – 647 kg. Among intrinsic factors, older cattle, dairy cattle, and female cattle had greater odds of bruising (OR=1.57 – 1.98). For extrinsic factors, the odds for bruising increased 1.4 – 2.2 in cattle sourced from auction markets and exposed to poor handling, suboptimal transportation conditions, and deficient facilities. In cattle from America, bruises are a concern because their prevalence is growing and 60 % of cattle assessed in the studies suffered a bruise. Improving facilities and transportation conditions together with proper training of the personnel during the handling and transportation of the cattle will reduce bruising incidence.
Article Details
References
Capper C. The language of forensic medicine: the meaning of some terms employed. Med Sci Law. 2001;41(3):256-259. doi:10.1177/002580240104 100309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002580240104100309
Gregory NG, Grandin T. Animal welfare and meat science. CABI Pub; 1998.
Grandin T. Livestock Handling and Transport. 5th edition. Boston, MA: CABI; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786399151.0000
Adzitey F. Effect of pre-slaughter animal handling on carcass and meat quality. International Food Research Journal. 2011;18(2).
Miranda-de la Lama GC, González-Castro CA, Gutiérrez-Piña FJ, Villarroel M, Maria GA, Estévez-Moreno LX. Horse welfare at slaughter: A novel approach to analyse bruised carcasses based on severity, damage patterns and their association with pre-slaughter risk factors. Meat Science. 2021;172:108341. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108341
Ferguson DM, Warner RD. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Science. 2008;80(1):12-19. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004
Huertas SM, van Eerdenburg FJCM, Gil A, Piaggio J. Prevalence of carcass bruises as an indicator of welfare in beef cattle and the relation to the economic impact. Vet Med Sci. 2015;1(1):9-15. doi:10.1002/vms3.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.2
Cruz-Monterrosa RG, Reséndiz-Cruz V, Rayas-Amor AA, López M, Miranda-de la Lama GC. Bruises in beef cattle at slaughter in Mexico: implications on quality, safety and shelf life of the meat. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017;49(1):145-152. doi:10.1007/s11250-016-1173-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1173-8
Folitse R, Owusu A, Amemor E, Opoku-Agyemang T, Tasiame W, Emikpe B. Preliminary study of bovine carcass bruises and its associated financial losses in kumasi abattoir, Ghana. Animal Research International. 2017;14(2).
FAOSTAT. Live Animals. 2019. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QA
FAO. Meat market review: Overview of global meat market developments in 2018. Rome, 2019 March 2019.
Paranhos da Costa M, Huertas SM, Gallo C, Dalla Costa OA. Strategies to promote farm animal welfare in Latin America and their effects on carcass and meat quality traits. Meat Science. 2012;92(3):221-226. doi:10.1016/j. meatsci.2012.03.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.03.005
Frisk M, Jonsson A, Sellman S, Flisberg P, Rönnqvist M, Wennergren U. Route optimization as an instrument to improve animal welfare and economics in pre-slaughter logistics. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193223. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0193223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193223
Valadez-Noriega M, Estévez-Moreno L, Rayas-Amor A, Rubio-Lozano M, Galindo F, Miranda-de la Lama G. Livestock hauliers’ attitudes, knowledge and current practices towards animal welfare, occupational wellbeing and transport risk factors: A Mexican survey. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2018;160:76-84. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.023
Miranda-de la Lama GC, Villarroel M, Maria GA. Livestock transport from the perspective of the pre-slaughter logistic chain: a review. Meat Sci. 2014;98(1):9- 20. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.04.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.04.005
Fordyce G, Wythes JR, Shorthose WR, Underwood DW, Shepherd RK. Cattle temperaments in extensive beef herds in northern Queensland: 2. Effect of temperament on carcass and meat quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 1988;28(6):689-693. doi:10.1071/EA9880689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9880689
Losada-Espinosa N, Villarroel M, Maria GA, Miranda-de la Lama GC. Pre-slaughter cattle welfare indicators for use in commercial abattoirs with voluntary monitoring systems: A systematic review. Meat Science. 2018;138:34-48. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.12.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.12.004
Grandin T. On-farm conditions that compromise animal welfare that can be monitored at the slaughter plant. Meat Science. 2017;132:52-58. doi:10.1016/j. meatsci.2017.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.05.004
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. US: John Wiley & Sons; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLOS Medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Diaz D, Rosiles RJ, Urias-Castro CJ, Rodriguez-Gaxiola MA, Gaxiola SM, Montero-Pardo A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of reproductive management practices used to induce resumption of ovarian cyclical activity in anestrous does. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2019;169:104709. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104709
Romo-Barron CB, Diaz D, Portillo-Loera JJ, Romo-Rubio JA, Jimenez-Trejo F, Montero-Pardo A. Impact of heat stress on the reproductive performance and physiology of ewes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J Biometeorol. 2019;63(7):949-962. doi:10.1007/s00484-019-01707-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01707-z
Bertoloni W, da Silva JL, de Abreu JS, Andreolla DL. Welfare and bruise index of cattle transported in different distance and trucks design in the Mato Grosso state - Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal. 2012;13(3):850-859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402012000300022
Bethancourt-Garcia JA, Vaz RZ, Vaz FN, Silva WB, Pascoal LL, Mendonça FS, et al. Pre-slaughter factors affecting the incidence of severe bruising in cattle carcasses. Livestock Science. 2019;222:41-48. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2019.02.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.02.009
Braga JS, Machado MF, Borges TD, de Souza M, Souza APO, Molento CFM. Cattle welfare assessment in two state regulated abattoirs in southern Brazil. Archives of Veterinary Science. 2014;19(3):24-35. doi:10.5380/avs.v19i3.34267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v19i3.34267
Cardoso MRP, Moura MS, Moreira MD. Occurrence of bruises in slaughtered cattle carcasses in a slaughter plant in Uberlândia-MG. PUBVET. 2011;5(6). Article 1032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22256/pubvet.v5n6.1032
Crosi G, Prado M, Huertas S, Imelio J, Piaggio J, Gil A. Estudio observacional sobre presencia y caracterización de hematomas en carcasas vacunas de Uruguay. Salud y Tecnología Veterinaria. 2015;3(2):41-50. doi:10.20453/stv.v3i2.2824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20453/stv.v3i2.2824
Da Silva B, de Mattoso MRB, de Oliveiraa HC, Morais HR, de Fátima K, Biase NG. Quantity, location, and description of bruises in beef cattle slaughtered under sanitary inspection. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 2014;42(1). http://www. redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=289029240022.
De Andrade EN, de Oliveira RR, Silva RAMS, Gonçalves HC, Pinheiro RSB. Prevalence of carcass bruising in cattle meat slaughtered in Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul state, after fluvial tranport. Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos. 2008;28(4):822-829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612008000400010
De Andrade EN, Silva RAMS, Roça RDO, Da Silva LAC, Gonçalves HC, Pinheiro RSB. Occurrence of carcass bruising of beef cattle in the Pantanal related to time spent transport. Ciencia Rural. 2008;38(7):1991-1996. doi:10.1590/ S0103-84782008000700030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000700030
De Assis DR, Rezende-Lago NC, de Marchi PG, DAmato CC. Perdas diretas ocasionadas por abscessos e hematomas em carcaças de bovinos Direct losses due abscesses and bruised in beef carcasses. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências Veterinárias. 2011;106(577-580):47-51.
De Freslon I, Strappini AC, Soto-Gamboa M, Gallo C. Caracterización de la reactividad conductual frente al manejo y su relación con el cortisol sanguíneo, contusiones y pH de la carne en novillos. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 2014;46(2):229-237. doi:10.4067/S0301-732X2014000200008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2014000200008
Eastwood LC, Boykin CA, Harris MK, Arnold AN, Hale DS, Kerth CR, et al. National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Transportation, mobility, and harvest-floor assessments of targeted characteristics that affect quality and value of cattle, carcasses, and by-products. Translational Animal Science. 2017;1(2):229-238. doi:10.2527/tas2017.0029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0029
Gallo C, Caro M, Villarroel C, Araya P. Characteristics of cattle slaughtered within the Xth Region (Chile) according to the terms stated by the official chilean standards for classification and carcass grading. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 1999;31(1):81-88. doi:10.4067/S0301-732X1999000100008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X1999000100008
Gallo C, Espinoza MA, Gasic J. Effects of 36 hours road transport with or without a resting period on live weight and some meat quality aspects in cattle. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 2001;33(1):43-53. doi:10.4067/ S0301-732X2001000100005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2001000100005
Gallo C, Perez VS, Sanhueza VC, Gasic YJ. Effects of transport time of steers before slaughter on behaviour, weight loss and some carcass characteristics. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 2000;32(2):157-170. doi:10.4067/ S0301-732X2000000200003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2000000200003
Garcia LG, Nicholson KL, Hoffman TW, Lawrence TE, Hale DS, Griffin DB, et al. National Beef Quality Audit 2005: Survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;86(12):3533-3543. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0782
Godoy M, Fernández H, Morales MA, Ibarra L, Sepúlveda C. Bruises in bovine carcasses. Incidence and potential risk. Avances en Ciencias Veterinarias. 1986;1(1):22-25. doi:10.5354/acv.v1i1.10378.
Goldhawk C, Janzen E, Gonzalez LA, Crowe T, Kastelic J, Kehler C, et al. Trailer temperature and humidity during winter transport of cattle in Canada and evaluation of indicators used to assess the welfare of cull beef cows before and after transport. Journal of Animal Science. 2015;93(7):3639-3653. doi:10.2527/ jas2014-8390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8390
Harris MK, Eastwood LC, Boykin CA, Arnold AN, Gehring KB, Hale DS, et al. National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Transportation, mobility, live cattle, and carcass assessments of targeted producer-related characteristics that affect value of market cows and bulls, their carcasses, and associated by-products. Translational Animal Science. 2017;1(4):570-584. doi:10.2527/tas2017.0063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0063
Huertas SM, Gil AD, Piaggio JM, van Eerdenburg FJCM. Transportation of beef cattle to slaughterhouses and how this relates to animal welfare and carcase bruising in an extensive production system. Animal Welfare. 2010;19(3):281-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600001664
Huertas SM, Kempener R, van Eerdenburg FJCM. Relationship between methods of loading and unloading, carcass bruising, and animal welfare in the transportation of extensively reared beef cattle. Animals. 2018;8(7). doi:10.3390/ ani8070119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070119
Lee TL, Reinhardt CD, Bartle SJ, Vahl CI, Siemens M, Thomson DU. Assessment of risk factors contributing to carcass bruising in fed cattle at commercial slaughter facilities. Translational Animal Science. 2017;1(4):489-497. doi:10.2527/ tas2017.0055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0055
Lorenzen CL, Hale DS, Griffin DB, Savell JW, Belk KE, Frederick TL, et al. National Beef Quality Audit: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes. Journal of Animal Science. 1993;71(6):1495-1502. doi:10.2527/1993.7161495x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.7161495x
McKeith RO, Gray GD, Hale DS, Kerth CR, Griffin DB, Savell JW, et al. National Beef Quality Audit-2011: Harvest-floor assessments of targeted characteristics that affect quality and value of cattle, carcasses, and byproducts. Journal of Animal Science. 2012;90(13):5135-5142. doi:10.2527/jas2012-5477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5477
McKenna DR, Roebert DL, Bates PK, Schmidt TB, Hale DS, Griffin DB, et al. National Beef Quality Audit-2000: survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers. Journal of Animal Science. 2002;80(5):1212-1222. doi:10.2527/2002.8051212x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8051212x
Mendonça FS, Vaz RZ, Cardoso FF, Restle J, Vaz FN, Pascoal LL, et al. Pre-slaughtering factors related to bruises on cattle carcasses. Animal Production Science. 2018;58(2):385-392. doi:10.1071/AN16177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16177
Mendonça FS, Vaz RZ, Leal WS, Restle J, Pascoal LL, Vaz MB, et al. Genetic group and horns presence in bruises and economic losses in cattle carcasses. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias. 2016;37(6):4265-4274. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37 n6p4265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p4265
Mendonça FS, Vaz RZ, Vaz FN, Leal WS, Silveira IDB, Restle J, et al. Causes of bruising in carcasses of beef cattle during farm, transport, and slaughterhouse handling in Brazil. Animal Science Journal. 2019;90(2):288-296. doi: 10.1111/ asj.13151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13151
Menezes LDM. Analysis of intrinsic and transportation variables about bruises profile in cattle carcasses. Revista Electronica de Veterinaria. 2018;19(8).
Miranda-de la Lama GC, Leyva IG, Barreras-Serrano A, Perez-Linares C, Sanchez-Lopez E, Maria GA, et al. Assessment of cattle welfare at a commercial slaughter plant in the northwest of Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012;44(3):497-504. doi:10.1007/s11250-011-9925-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9925-y
Moreira PSA, Polizel Neto A, Martins LR, Lourenço FJ, Palhari C, Faria FF. Occurrence of carcasses bruises of beef cattle transported by two distances. Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal. 2014;15(3):689-695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402014000300018
Petroni R, Bürger KP, Gonçalez PO, Rossi GAM, Vidal-Martins AMC, Aguilar CEG. Bruises occurrence in cattle carcasses at a slaughterhouse. Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal. 2013;14(3):478-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402013000300009
Rebagliati JE, Ballerio M, Acerbi R, Diaz M, Alvarez MM, Bigatti F, et al. Evaluación de las prácticas ganaderas en bovinos que causan perjuicios económicos en plantas frigoríficas de la República Argentina (2005). Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria. 2008;IX(10B):1-40
Rezac DJ, Thomson DU, Siemens MG, Prouty FL, Reinhardt CD, Bartle SJ. A survey of gross pathologic conditions in cull cows at slaughter in the Great Lakes region of the United States. Journal of Dairy Science. 2014;97(7):4227-4235. doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7636
Roeber DL, Mies PD, Smith CD, Belk KE, Field TG, Tatum JD, et al. National market cow and bull beef quality audit-1999: a survey of producer-related defects in market cows and bulls. Journal of Animal Science. 2001;79(3):658-665. doi:10.2527/2001.793658x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.793658x
Romero MH, Gutierrez C, Sanchez JA. Evaluation of preslaughter management and its relationship with the bruises presence on beef carcasses. Biosalud. 2011;10(2):28-36.
Romero MH, Uribe-Velasquez LF, Sanchez JA, Miranda-de la Lama GC. Risk factors influencing bruising and high muscle pH in Colombian cattle carcasses due to transport and pre-slaughter operations. Meat Science. 2013;95(2):256-263. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.014
Sanchez-Perez JN, Robles-Estrada JC, Portillo-Loera JJ, Rios-Rincón FG, Felix-Bernal JA, Leyva-Medina KH, et al. Prevalence, characterization and risk factors associated with bovine carcasses bruises at a slaughterhouse in Sinaloa, Mexico. Biotecnia. 2019;XXI(3):114-120. doi:10.18633/biotecnia.v21i3.1041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v21i3.1041
Sornas AS, Rossi P, Jr., Moizes FF. Losses occasioned by injuries in bovine carcass and its economic reflection in the state of Paraná. Archives of Veterinary Science. 2016;21(3):119-130. doi:10.5380/avs.v21i3.45372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v21i3.45372
Strappini AC, Frankena K, Metz JH, Gallo B, Kemp B. Prevalence and risk factors for bruises in chilean bovine carcasses. Meat Sci. 2010;86(3):859-864. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.07.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.07.010
Strappini AC, Frankena K, Metz JH, Gallo C, Kemp B. Characteristics of bruises in carcasses of cows sourced from farms or from livestock markets. Animal. 2012;6(3):502-509. doi:10.1017/S1751731111001698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001698
Strappini AC, Metz JH, Gallo C, Frankena K, Vargas R, de Freslon I, et al. Bruises in culled cows: when, where and how are they inflicted? Animal. 2013;7(3):485- 491. doi:10.1017/S1751731112001863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001863
Tuninetti N, Blainq L, Otero JL. Evaluación de las contusiones y del pH en canales bovinas en un matadero de la provincia de Santa Fé. InVet. 2017;19(1).
Van Donkersgoed J, Jewison G, Bygrove S, Gillis K, Malchow D, McLeod G. Canadian beef quality audit 1998-99. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 2001;42(2):121- 126. PMCID:PMC1476488.
Van Donkersgoed J, Jewison G, Mann M, Cherry B, Altwasser B, Lower R, et al. Canadian beef quality audit. Can Vet J. 1997;38(4):217-225. PMCID:PMC1576570.
Vega-Britez GD, Alcaraz A, Lesmo ND, Alvarenga JD, Velazquez JA. Effect of land transport on bovine carcass in the Northern of Paraguay. Compendio de Ciencias Veterinarias. 2019;9(1):35-41. doi:10.18004/compend.cienc. vet.2019.09.01.35-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18004/compend.cienc.vet.2019.09.01.35-41
Youngers ME, Thomson DU, Schwandt EF, Simroth JC, Bartle SJ, Siemens MG, et al. Case study: Prevalence of horns and bruising in feedlot cattle at slaughter. Professional Animal Scientist. 2017;33(1):135-139. doi:10.15232/ pas.2016-01551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2016-01551
Swanson J, Morrow-Tesch J. Cattle transport: Historical, research, and future perspectives. Journal of Animal Science. 2001;79(suppl_E):E102-E109. doi:10.2527/jas2001.79E-SupplE102x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2001.79E-SupplE102x
Wigham EE, Butterworth A, Wotton S. Assessing cattle welfare at slaughter – Why is it important and what challenges are faced? Meat Science. 2018;145:171- 177. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.010
Gallo C, Tadich N. Bienestar animal y calidad de carne durante los manejos previos al faenamiento en bovinos. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria. 2008;9(10B). https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=63617111001
Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi M-V, Janczak AM, Visser EK, et al. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2006;101(3-4):185-242. doi:10.1016/j. applanim.2006.02.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
Koknaroglu H, Akunal T. Animal welfare: an animal science approach. Meat Sci. 2013;95(4):821-827. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.030
Barington K, Dich-Jørgensen K, Jensen HE. A retrospective study of forensic cases of skin ulcerations in Danish pigs from 2000 to 2014. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2015;58(1):48. doi:10.1186/s13028-016-0229-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-016-0229-0
Costa LN, Fiego DPL, Tassone F, Russo V. The relationship between carcass bruising in bulls and behaviour observed during pre-slaughter phases. Veterinary Research Communications. 2006;30:379-381. doi:10.1007/ s11259-006-0086-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-006-0086-9
Grandin T. Livestock handling and transport. 3 ed. Grandin T, editor. Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CAB International; 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932190.0000
Grandin T. Bruises and carcass damage. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems. 1980;1(2):121-137.
Grandin T. Effect of animal welfare audits of slaughter plants by a major fast food company on cattle handling and stunning practices. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000;216(6):848-851. doi:10.2460/javma.2000.216.848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2000.216.848
Tibesso G, Hiko A. Effects of pre-slaughter animal handling on physico-chemical and microbiological quality of beef in selected municipal abattoirs, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. EC Veterinary Science. 2019;4:202-212. doi:10.4314/ ejst.v14i2.1.
Broom DM. Causes of poor welfare in large animals during transport. Vet Res Commun. 2003;27(Suppl 1)1:515-518. doi:10.1023/b:verc.0000014210.29 852.9a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VERC.0000014210.29852.9a
Barington K, Agger JF, Nielsen SS, Dich-Jorgensen K, Jensen HE. Gross and histopathological evaluation of human inflicted bruises in Danish slaughter pigs. BMC Vet Res. 2016;12(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0869-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0869-3
Munro R, Munro H. Some challenges in forensic veterinary pathology: a review. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 2013;149(1):57-73. doi:10.1016/j. jcpa.2012.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2012.10.001
Barington K, Jensen HE. Forensic cases of bruises in pigs. Vet Rec. 2013;173(21):526. doi:10.1136/vr.101854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101854
Brennecke K, Zeferino CP, Soares VE, Orlandi C, Bertipaglia L, Sgavioli S, et al. Welfare during pre-slaughter handling and carcass lesions of beef cattle submitted to different loading densities. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira. 2020;40(12):985- 991. doi:10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-5998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5998
Wythes JR, Kaus RK, Newman GA. Bruising in beef cattle slaughtered at an abattoir in southern queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 1985;25(4):727-733. doi:10.1071/EA9850727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9850727
Weeks CA, McNally PW, Warriss PD. Influence of the design of facilities at auction markets and animal handling procedures on bruising in cattle. Vet Rec. 2002;150(24):743-748. doi:10.1136/vr.150.24.743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.150.24.743
Hoffman LC, Luhl J. Causes of cattle bruising during handling and transport in Namibia. Meat Sci. 2012;92(2):115-124. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.021
Njisane YZ, Muchenje V. Farm to abattoir conditions, animal factors and their subsequent effects on cattle behavioural responses and beef quality—A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2017;30(6):755. doi:10.5713/ ajas.16.0037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0037
McNally PW, Warriss PD. Prevalence of carcase bruising and stick-marking in cattle bought from different auction markets. Vet Rec. 1997;140(9):231-232. doi:10.1136/vr.140.9.231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.140.9.231
Fisher AD, Colditz IG, Lee C, Ferguson DM. The influence of land transport on animal welfare in extensive farming systems. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2009;4(4):157-162. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2009.03.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2009.03.002
González L, Schwartzkopf-Genswein K, Bryan M, Silasi R, Brown F. Relationships between transport conditions and welfare outcomes during commercial long haul transport of cattle in North America. Journal of Animal Science. 2012;90(10):3640-3651. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4796
Liotta L, Costa LN, Chiofalo B, Ravarotto L, Chiofalo V. Effect of lairage duration on some blood constituents and beef quality in bulls after long journey. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2007;6(4):375-384. doi:10.4081/ijas.2007.375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.375
Grandin T. Handling methods and facilities to reduce stress on cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1998;14(2):325-341. doi:10.1016/ s0749-0720(15)30257-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30257-7
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401-406. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
License

Veterinaria México OA by Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
Based on a work at http://www.revistas.unam.mx
- All articles in Veterinaria México OA re published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC-BY 4.0). With this license, authors retain copyright but allow any user to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work, without needing to provide additional permission as long as appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
- By using this license, all Veterinaria México OAarticles meet or exceed all funder and institutional requirements for being considered Open Access.
- Authors cannot use copyrighted material within their article unless that material has also been made available under a similarly liberal license.

