Differences in small-breed dogs' body language and vocalizations in a negative context

Main Article Content

José Alfredo Zepeda
Humberto Pérez-Espinosa
Veronica Reyes Meza
Mariel Urbina Escalante
Benjamín Gutiérrez Serafin
María de Lourdes Arteaga Castañeda

Abstract

A dog's emotional state is communicated primarily through body language, readily observable by humans and other animals. Additionally, dogs express visual and auditory signals differently according to the situation they are experiencing. However, there is a need for more research on smaller breeds since they tend to display more behavioral issues than larger breeds. The objective of the present study was to identify the behavioral characteristics of 25 dogs of three different small breeds (Chihuahua, Toy Poodle, and Miniature Schnauzer) in a negative context. We used a web-based tool called the Dog Actions Video Annotation Interface (DAVAI) to evaluate the movements of the tail, legs, snout, and vocalizations when the dogs were exposed to unfamiliar people. Our results showed no significant differences in dog behavior associated with breed. However, we identified variations in dog vocalizations explained by the sex, with male dogs whining more frequently than females. We highlight the importance of understanding dog body language and vocalizations, regardless of their breed. Our study is particularly relevant in negative contexts, where dogs may exhibit distress signals that require prompt intervention to alleviate their suffering.

Keywords:
Behavior visual communication Chihuahua Poodle Schnauzer unfamiliar person

Article Details

Author Biographies

José Alfredo Zepeda, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala. Centro Tlaxcala de Biología de la Conducta, Tlaxcala, México

Centro Tlaxcala de Biología de la Conducta, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, México

Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México

Humberto Pérez-Espinosa, Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica (INAOE). Coordinación de Ciencias Computacionales. Puebla, México

Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada: Unidad de Transferencia Tecnológica Tepic

Mariel Urbina Escalante, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala. Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas. Tlaxcala, México

Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala

Benjamín Gutiérrez Serafin, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Unidad de Transferencia Tecnológica Tepic (UT3), México

Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Unidad de Transferencia Tecnológica Tepic

María de Lourdes Arteaga Castañeda, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala. Centro Tlaxcala de Biología de la Conducta, Tlaxcala, México

Centro Tlaxcala de Biología de la Conducta, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, México

References

Mariti C, Gazzano A, Moore JL, Baragli P, Chelli L, Sighieri C. Perception of dogs’ stress by their owners. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2012;7(4):213−219. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.09.004.

Albuquerque N, Guo K, Wilkinson A, Savalli C, Otta E, Mills D. Dogs recognize dog and human emotions. Biology Letters. 2016;12(1):20150883.

Hare B, Tomasello M. Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 1999;113(2):173−177.

Miklösi A, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V. Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Animal Cognition. 1998;1(2):113−121.

Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V. Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2001;115(2):122−126.

Mota-Rojas D, Marcet-Rius M, Ogi Asahi, Hernández-Ávalos I, Mariti C, Martínez-Burnes J, et al. Current advances in assessment of dog’s emotions, facial expressions, and their use for clinical recognition of pain. Animals. 2021;11(11):3334. doi: 10.3390/ani11113334.

Pongrácz P, Molnár C, Miklósi Á. Acoustic parameters of dog barks carry emotional information for humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2006;100(3–4):228–240.

Bremhorst A, Mills DS, Stolzlechner L, Würbel H, Riemer S. “puppy dog eyes” are associated with eye movements, not communication. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:568935.

Demirbas YS, Ozturk H, Emre B, Kockaya M, Ozvardar T, Scott A. Adults’ ability to interpret canine body language during a dog–child interaction. Anthrozoos. 2016;29(4):581–596.

Pérez-Espinosa H, Reyes-Meza V, Aguilar-Benitez E, Sanzón-Rosas YM. Automatic individual dog recognition based on the acoustic properties of its barks. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2018;34(5):3273–3280.

Pérez-Espinosa H, Torres-García AA. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative features for the acoustic analysis of domestic dogs’ vocalizations. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2019;36(5):5051–5061.

Houpt KA. Domestic Animal Behavior for Veterinarians and Animal Scientists. 6th edition. Nashville, TN: John Wiley & Sons; 2018.

Siniscalchi M, d’Ingeo S, Minunno M, Quaranta A. Communication in dogs. Animals. 2018;8(8):131. doi: 10.3390/ani8080131.

Bradshaw J, Rooney N. Dog social behavior and communication. In: Serpell J, editor. The Domestic Dog. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press; 2016. pp. 133–159.

Hasegawa M, Ohtani N, Ohta M. Dogs’ body language relevant to learning achievement. Animals. 2014;4(1):45–58.

Simpson BS. Canine Communication. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 1997;27(3):445–464.

Bekoff M. Social play and play-soliciting by infant canids. American Zoologist. 1974;14(1):323–340.

Blackwell EJ, Bradshaw JWS, Casey RA. Fear responses to noises in domestic dogs: Prevalence, risk factors and co-occurrence with other fear related behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2013;145(1–2):15–25.

Yeon SC. The vocal communication of canines. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2007;2(4):141–144.

Hecht J, Horowitz A. Introduction to dog behavior. In: Animal Behavior for Shelter Veterinarians and Staff.. 2015;3–30.

Hecht EE, Zapata I, Alvarez CE, Gutman DA, Preuss TM, Kent M, et al. Neurodevelopmental scaling is a major driver of brain-behavior differences in temperament across dog breeds. Brain Structure & Function. 2021;226(8):2725–2739.

Zapata I, Lilly ML, Herron ME, Serpell JA, Alvarez CE. Genetic testing of dogs predicts problem behaviors in clinical and nonclinical samples. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):102.

Martínez ÁG, Santamarina Pernas G, Diéguez Casalta FJ, Suárez Rey ML, de la Cruz Palomino LF. Risk factors associated with behavioral problems in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research. 2011;6(4):225−231. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.01.006.

McGreevy PD, Georgevsky D, Carrasco J, Valenzuela M, Duffy DL, Serpell JA. Dog behavior co-varies with height, bodyweight and skull shape. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e80529.

Scandurra A, Alterisio A, Di Cosmo A, D’Aniello B. Behavioral and perceptual differences between sexes in dogs: an overview. Animals. 2018;8(9):151.

Stephan G, Leidhold J, Hammerschmidt K. Pet dogs home alone: a video-based study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2021;244(105463):105463.

Yamada R, Kuze-Arata S, Kiyokawa Y, Takeuchi Y. Prevalence of 25 canine behavioral problems and relevant factors of each behavior in Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 2019;81(8):1090–1096. doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0705.

Casey RA, Loftus B, Bolster C, Richards GJ, Blackwell EJ. Human directed aggression in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): cccurrence in different contexts and risk factors. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2014;152:52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.003.

Baranyiová E, Holub A, Tyrlik M, Janáčková B, Ernstová M. Behavioural differences of dogs of various ages in Czech households. Acta Veterinaria Brno. 2004;73(2):229–233.

Blank Hamer IJ. Enciclopedia de Perros de Raza. DF, México: Trillas; 2008.

Serpell JA, Duffy DL. Dog breeds and their behavior. In: Domestic Dog Cognition and Behavior. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014. pp. 31–57.

Duffy DL, Hsu Y, Serpell JA. Breed differences in canine aggression. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2008;114(3–4):441–60. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.04.006.

McGreevy PD, Georgevsky D, Carrasco J, Valenzuela M, Duffy DL, Serpell JA. Dog behavior co-varies with height, bodyweight and skull shape. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080529.

Taylor AM, Reby D, McComb K. Context-related variation in the vocal growling behaviour of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Ethology. 2009;115(10):905–915.

Eken Asp H, Fikse WF, Nilsson K, Strandberg E. Breed differences in everyday behaviour of dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2015;169:69–77.

Sibiryakova OV, Volodin IA, Volodina EV. Polyphony of domestic dog whines and vocal cues to body size. Current Zoology. 2021;67(2):165–176.

Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh P. irr: various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement. R package version 0.84.1. 2919. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/irr.pdf 2019

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Österreich: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022.

Hart BL, Miller MF. Behavioral profiles of dog breeds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 1985;186(11):1175–1180.

Ruge L, Cox E, Mancini C, Luck R. User centered design approaches to measuring canine behavior: Tail wagging as a measure of user experience. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. New York, NY, US: ACM; 2018.

Handelman B, Sloan M. Canine Behavior: A Photo Illustrated Handbook. Wenatchee, WA: Woof and Word Press; 2008.

Siniscalchi M, Lusito R, Vallortigara G, Quaranta A. Seeing left- or right-asymmetric tail wagging produces different emotional responses in dogs. Current Biology. 2013;23(22):2279–2282.

Quaranta A, Siniscalchi M, Vallortigara G. Asymmetric tail-wagging responses by dogs to different emotive stimuli. Current Biology. 2007;17(6):R199–201.

Lecorps B, Rödel HG, Féron C. Assessment of anxiety in open field and elevated plus maze using infrared thermography. Physiology & Behavior. 2016;157:209–216.

Travain T, Colombo ES, Grandi LC, Heinzl E, Pelosi A, Prato Previde E, et al. How good is this food? A study on dogs’ emotional responses to a potentially pleasant event using infrared thermography. Physiology & Behavior. 2016;159:80–87.

Travain T, Valsecchi P. Infrared thermography in the study of animals’ emotional responses: a critical review. Animals. 2021;11(9):2510.

Katayama M, Kubo T, Mogi K, Ikeda K, Nagasawa M, Kikusui T. Heart rate variability predicts the emotional state in dogs. Behavioural Processes. 2016;128:108–112.

Von Borell E, Langbein J, Després G, Hansen S, Leterrier C, Marchant-Forde J, et al. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals–a review. Physiology & Behavior. 2007;92(3):293–316.

Zupan M, Buskas J, Altimiras J, Keeling LJ. Assessing positive emotional states in dogs using heart rate and heart rate variability. Physiology & Behavior. 2016;155:102–111.

Molnár C, Kaplan F, Roy P, Pachet F, Pongrácz P, Dóka A, et al. Classification of dog barks: a machine learning approach. Animal Cognition. 2008;11(3):389–400. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0129-9.

Pongrácz P, Molnár C, Miklósi Á, Csányi V. Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2005;119(2):136–144. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.136.

Yin S. A new perspective on barking in dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2002;116(2):189–193. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.116.2.189.

Appleby DL, Bradshaw JWS, Casey RA. Relationship between aggressive and avoidance behaviour by dogs and their experience in the first six months of life. Veterinary Record. 2002;150(14):434–438. doi: 10.1136/vr.150.14.434.