Differences in small-breed dogs' body language and vocalizations in a negative context
Main Article Content
Abstract
A dog's emotional state is communicated primarily through body language, readily observable by humans and other animals. Additionally, dogs express visual and auditory signals differently according to the situation they are experiencing. However, there is a need for more research on smaller breeds since they tend to display more behavioral issues than larger breeds. The objective of the present study was to identify the behavioral characteristics of 25 dogs of three different small breeds (Chihuahua, Toy Poodle, and Miniature Schnauzer) in a negative context. We used a web-based tool called the Dog Actions Video Annotation Interface (DAVAI) to evaluate the movements of the tail, legs, snout, and vocalizations when the dogs were exposed to unfamiliar people. Our results showed no significant differences in dog behavior associated with breed. However, we identified variations in dog vocalizations explained by the sex, with male dogs whining more frequently than females. We highlight the importance of understanding dog body language and vocalizations, regardless of their breed. Our study is particularly relevant in negative contexts, where dogs may exhibit distress signals that require prompt intervention to alleviate their suffering.
Article Details
References
Mariti C, Gazzano A, Moore JL, Baragli P, Chelli L, Sighieri C. Perception of dogs’ stress by their owners. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2012;7(4):213−219. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.09.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.09.004
Albuquerque N, Guo K, Wilkinson A, Savalli C, Otta E, Mills D. Dogs recognize dog and human emotions. Biology Letters. 2016;12(1):20150883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0883
Hare B, Tomasello M. Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 1999;113(2):173−177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7036.113.2.173
Miklösi A, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V. Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Animal Cognition. 1998;1(2):113−121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710050016
Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V. Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2001;115(2):122−126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7036.115.2.122
Mota-Rojas D, Marcet-Rius M, Ogi Asahi, Hernández-Ávalos I, Mariti C, Martínez-Burnes J, et al. Current advances in assessment of dog’s emotions, facial expressions, and their use for clinical recognition of pain. Animals. 2021;11(11):3334. doi: 10.3390/ani11113334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113334
Pongrácz P, Molnár C, Miklósi Á. Acoustic parameters of dog barks carry emotional information for humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2006;100(3–4):228–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.12.004
Bremhorst A, Mills DS, Stolzlechner L, Würbel H, Riemer S. “puppy dog eyes” are associated with eye movements, not communication. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:568935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.568935
Demirbas YS, Ozturk H, Emre B, Kockaya M, Ozvardar T, Scott A. Adults’ ability to interpret canine body language during a dog–child interaction. Anthrozoos. 2016;29(4):581–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2016.1228750
Pérez-Espinosa H, Reyes-Meza V, Aguilar-Benitez E, Sanzón-Rosas YM. Automatic individual dog recognition based on the acoustic properties of its barks. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2018;34(5):3273–3280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169509
Pérez-Espinosa H, Torres-García AA. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative features for the acoustic analysis of domestic dogs’ vocalizations. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2019;36(5):5051–5061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179050
Houpt KA. Domestic Animal Behavior for Veterinarians and Animal Scientists. 6th edition. Nashville, TN: John Wiley & Sons; 2018.
Siniscalchi M, d’Ingeo S, Minunno M, Quaranta A. Communication in dogs. Animals. 2018;8(8):131. doi: 10.3390/ani8080131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8080131
Bradshaw J, Rooney N. Dog social behavior and communication. In: Serpell J, editor. The Domestic Dog. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press; 2016. pp. 133–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139161800.008
Hasegawa M, Ohtani N, Ohta M. Dogs’ body language relevant to learning achievement. Animals. 2014;4(1):45–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani4010045
Simpson BS. Canine Communication. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 1997;27(3):445–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(97)50048-9
Bekoff M. Social play and play-soliciting by infant canids. American Zoologist. 1974;14(1):323–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/14.1.323
Blackwell EJ, Bradshaw JWS, Casey RA. Fear responses to noises in domestic dogs: Prevalence, risk factors and co-occurrence with other fear related behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2013;145(1–2):15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.12.004
Yeon SC. The vocal communication of canines. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2007;2(4):141–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2007.07.006
Hecht J, Horowitz A. Introduction to dog behavior. In: Animal Behavior for Shelter Veterinarians and Staff.. 2015;3–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119421313.ch1
Hecht EE, Zapata I, Alvarez CE, Gutman DA, Preuss TM, Kent M, et al. Neurodevelopmental scaling is a major driver of brain-behavior differences in temperament across dog breeds. Brain Structure & Function. 2021;226(8):2725–2739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02368-8
Zapata I, Lilly ML, Herron ME, Serpell JA, Alvarez CE. Genetic testing of dogs predicts problem behaviors in clinical and nonclinical samples. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08351-9
Martínez ÁG, Santamarina Pernas G, Diéguez Casalta FJ, Suárez Rey ML, de la Cruz Palomino LF. Risk factors associated with behavioral problems in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research. 2011;6(4):225−231. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.01.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.01.006
McGreevy PD, Georgevsky D, Carrasco J, Valenzuela M, Duffy DL, Serpell JA. Dog behavior co-varies with height, bodyweight and skull shape. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e80529.
Scandurra A, Alterisio A, Di Cosmo A, D’Aniello B. Behavioral and perceptual differences between sexes in dogs: an overview. Animals. 2018;8(9):151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8090151
Stephan G, Leidhold J, Hammerschmidt K. Pet dogs home alone: a video-based study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2021;244(105463):105463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105463
Yamada R, Kuze-Arata S, Kiyokawa Y, Takeuchi Y. Prevalence of 25 canine behavioral problems and relevant factors of each behavior in Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 2019;81(8):1090–1096. doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.18-0705
Casey RA, Loftus B, Bolster C, Richards GJ, Blackwell EJ. Human directed aggression in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): cccurrence in different contexts and risk factors. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2014;152:52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.003
Baranyiová E, Holub A, Tyrlik M, Janáčková B, Ernstová M. Behavioural differences of dogs of various ages in Czech households. Acta Veterinaria Brno. 2004;73(2):229–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200473020229
Blank Hamer IJ. Enciclopedia de Perros de Raza. DF, México: Trillas; 2008.
Serpell JA, Duffy DL. Dog breeds and their behavior. In: Domestic Dog Cognition and Behavior. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014. pp. 31–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53994-7_2
Duffy DL, Hsu Y, Serpell JA. Breed differences in canine aggression. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2008;114(3–4):441–60. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.04.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.04.006
McGreevy PD, Georgevsky D, Carrasco J, Valenzuela M, Duffy DL, Serpell JA. Dog behavior co-varies with height, bodyweight and skull shape. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080529
Taylor AM, Reby D, McComb K. Context-related variation in the vocal growling behaviour of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Ethology. 2009;115(10):905–915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01681.x
Eken Asp H, Fikse WF, Nilsson K, Strandberg E. Breed differences in everyday behaviour of dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2015;169:69–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.04.010
Sibiryakova OV, Volodin IA, Volodina EV. Polyphony of domestic dog whines and vocal cues to body size. Current Zoology. 2021;67(2):165–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaa042
Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh P. irr: various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement. R package version 0.84.1. 2919. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/irr.pdf 2019
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Österreich: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022.
Hart BL, Miller MF. Behavioral profiles of dog breeds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 1985;186(11):1175–1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1985.186.11.1175
Ruge L, Cox E, Mancini C, Luck R. User centered design approaches to measuring canine behavior: Tail wagging as a measure of user experience. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. New York, NY, US: ACM; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3295598.3295599
Handelman B, Sloan M. Canine Behavior: A Photo Illustrated Handbook. Wenatchee, WA: Woof and Word Press; 2008.
Siniscalchi M, Lusito R, Vallortigara G, Quaranta A. Seeing left- or right-asymmetric tail wagging produces different emotional responses in dogs. Current Biology. 2013;23(22):2279–2282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.027
Quaranta A, Siniscalchi M, Vallortigara G. Asymmetric tail-wagging responses by dogs to different emotive stimuli. Current Biology. 2007;17(6):R199–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.008
Lecorps B, Rödel HG, Féron C. Assessment of anxiety in open field and elevated plus maze using infrared thermography. Physiology & Behavior. 2016;157:209–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.02.014
Travain T, Colombo ES, Grandi LC, Heinzl E, Pelosi A, Prato Previde E, et al. How good is this food? A study on dogs’ emotional responses to a potentially pleasant event using infrared thermography. Physiology & Behavior. 2016;159:80–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.019
Travain T, Valsecchi P. Infrared thermography in the study of animals’ emotional responses: a critical review. Animals. 2021;11(9):2510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092510
Katayama M, Kubo T, Mogi K, Ikeda K, Nagasawa M, Kikusui T. Heart rate variability predicts the emotional state in dogs. Behavioural Processes. 2016;128:108–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.015
Von Borell E, Langbein J, Després G, Hansen S, Leterrier C, Marchant-Forde J, et al. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals–a review. Physiology & Behavior. 2007;92(3):293–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007
Zupan M, Buskas J, Altimiras J, Keeling LJ. Assessing positive emotional states in dogs using heart rate and heart rate variability. Physiology & Behavior. 2016;155:102–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.11.027
Molnár C, Kaplan F, Roy P, Pachet F, Pongrácz P, Dóka A, et al. Classification of dog barks: a machine learning approach. Animal Cognition. 2008;11(3):389–400. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0129-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0129-9
Pongrácz P, Molnár C, Miklósi Á, Csányi V. Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2005;119(2):136–144. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.136
Yin S. A new perspective on barking in dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2002;116(2):189–193. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.116.2.189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7036.116.2.189
Appleby DL, Bradshaw JWS, Casey RA. Relationship between aggressive and avoidance behaviour by dogs and their experience in the first six months of life. Veterinary Record. 2002;150(14):434–438. doi: 10.1136/vr.150.14.434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.150.14.434
License

Veterinaria México OA by Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
Based on a work at http://www.revistas.unam.mx
- All articles in Veterinaria México OA re published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC-BY 4.0). With this license, authors retain copyright but allow any user to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work, without needing to provide additional permission as long as appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
- By using this license, all Veterinaria México OAarticles meet or exceed all funder and institutional requirements for being considered Open Access.
- Authors cannot use copyrighted material within their article unless that material has also been made available under a similarly liberal license.

