Neonatal zoometry as a predictor of productive performance in Ts'üdi Xirgo Creole piglets

Main Article Content

Julio Cesar Rodríguez-Montoya
Adelfa del Carmen García-Contreras
Yasmin Guadalupe De Loera-Ortega
Armando Pérez-Torres
María José Segura-Peñafiel
Jesús Alberto Guevara-González

Abstract

The conservation of animal genetic resources is a key component of food security and rural development in Mexico. However, some populations are at risk of disappearing, such as Creole pigs, which are maintained in small rural production systems where high mortality rates and limited productivity of suckling piglets remain major constraints. This study evaluated whether neonatal zoometric measurements could predict productive performance during lactation in ts'üdi xirgo Creole piglets. At birth, piglets were weighed (birth weight; BW) and the following zoometric measurements were recorded: head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), thoracic circumference (TC), and body length (BL). Additionally, zoometric indices were calculated, including body mass index (BMI) and ponderal index (PI). Multivariable regression models were constructed to identify combinations of variables associated with improved productive traits during lactation, including body weight at day 21 (W21), weaning weight (WW), and average daily gain (ADG). Models included one zoometric measurement and one zoometric index at birth as fixed variables, while days of lactation (DL) were included as a blocking factor. Results showed that the combination of BW, TC, PI, and DL provided the best prediction for W21 (P = 0.001) and WW (P = 0.003). In contrast, ADG was best explained by the variables BW, BL, PI, and DL (P = 0.01). These findings suggest that neonatal physical characteristics are important predictors of productive performance in Creole piglets. The implementation of tools and protocols for early identification of piglets at risk could improve management strategies during lactation, reduce pre-weaning mortality, and contribute to the conservation and productive sustainability of native pig populations, thereby supporting the livelihoods of rural families involved in Creole pig production.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Adelfa del Carmen García-Contreras, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco (UAM-X), Departamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal. CDMX, México.

Profesora investigadora titular "C" del Departamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal, División de Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, UAM. 

Yasmin Guadalupe De Loera-Ortega, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán. Estado de México, México.

Profesora de carrera asociado B, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, UNAM.

Armando Pérez-Torres, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Departamento de Biología Celular y Tisular, Facultad de Medicina. CDMX, México.

Profesor de carrera titular A, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM.

María José Segura-Peñafiel, Universidad Politécnica de Francisco I Madero. Francisco I Madero, Hidalgo, México.

Profesora de Asignatura, Ingeniería en Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Francisco I Madero, Hidalgo.

Jesús Alberto Guevara-González, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco (UAM-X), Departamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal. CDMX, México.

Profesor investigador titular "C", Departamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal, División de Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, UAM.

References

García A, de Loera Y, Rodríguez J, Medina C, Rivera U, Segura M, Martínez Y. Recuperación de la población del cerdo negro peludo (ts’üdi xirgo) del Valle del Mezquital. Revista de la Academia Veterinaria Mexicana. 2021;(57):91–104.

Lemus C. Sistemas de crianza rural del cerdo criollo en México. En: Lemus FC, Alonso SM. El cerdo pelón mexicano y otros cerdos criollos. Nayarit, México: Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit; 2005:23–28.

Sierra A, Ortiz J, Bojórquez J, Canul M, Tamayo J, Rodríguez J, et al. Conservación y uso sustentable del cerdo pelón en Yucatán. Quehacer Científico en Chiapas. 2016;11(1):13–28.

Ángel A, García C, García A, Valencia M, Velázquez P. Tipificación y caracterización del sistema de producción del cerdo criollo en la región centro, México. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios. 2021;8(2):e2777. doi: 10.19136/era.a8nII.2777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a8n3.2777

DAD-IS. Sistema de Información sobre la Diversidad de los Animales Domésticos, Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO), 2023. https://www.fao.org/dad-is/browse-by-country-and-species/en/

Martínez G, Román S, Vélez A, Cabrera C, Cantú A, de la Cruz L. Morfometría del cerdo de traspatio en áreas rurales en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2016;7(4):431–440. doi: 10.22319/rmcp.v7i4.4276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v7i4.4276

Segura-Peñafiel M, De Loera-Ortega Y, Guevara-González J, Medina-González C, Rodríguez-Montoya J, García-Contreras A. Caracterización reproductiva de cerdas criollas t´südi xirgo en unidades de producción de baja densidad. Revista Mexicana de Agroecosistemas. 2021;8(2):41–49.

Esmeraldas R, Armijos J, Maldonado D, Delgado J, Navas F, Toalombo P. Comparación de las variables morfológicas de cerdos criollos en la provincia de Chimborazo y Loja. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2023;72(279):236–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v72i279.5738

Linares V, Linares F, Mendoza G. Caracterización etnozootécnica y potencial carnicero de Sus escrofa “cerdo criollo” en Latinoamérica. Scientia Agropecuaria. 2011;(2):97–110. doi: 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2011.02.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2011.02.05

Muns R, Manzanilla EG, Sol C, Manteca X, Gasa J. Piglet behavior as a measure of vitality and its influence on piglet survival and growth during lactation. Journal of Animal Science. 2013;(91)4:1838–1843. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5501

Galiot L, Lachance I, Laforest J, Guay F. Modelling piglet growth and mortality on commercial hog farms using variables describing individual animals, litters, sows and management factors. Animal Reproduction Science. 2018;(188):57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.11.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.11.009

Douglas S, Edwaerds S, Kyriazakis I. Are all piglets born lightweight alike? Morphological measurements as predictors of postnatal performance. Journal of Animal Science. 2016;(94)8:3510–3518. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0142

Tucker B, Petrovski K, Craig J, Morrison R, Smits RJ, Kirkwood RN. Piglet morphology: Indicators of neonatal viability? Animals. 2022;(12)5:658. doi: 10.3390/ani12050658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12050658

Amdi C, Krogh U, Flummer C, Oksbjerg N, Hansen CF, Theil PK. Intrauterine growth restricted piglets defined by their head shape ingest insufficient amounts of colostrum. Journal of Animal Science. 2013;91:5605–5613. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6824

Hales J, Moussen VA, Nielsen MB, Hansen CF. Individual physical characteristics of neonatal piglets affect preweaning survival or piglets born in a noncrated system. Journal of Animal Science. 2013;91(10):4991–5003. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5740

Huting A, Sakkas P, Wellock I, Almendra K, Kyriazakis I. Once small always small? To what extent morphometric characteristics and post-weaning starter regime affect pig lifetime growth performance. Porcine Health Management. 2018;4(21). doi: 10.1186/s40813-018-0098-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0098-1

Farmer C, Edwards S. Review: Improving the performance of neonatal pigs. Animal. 2022;16:100350. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100350

Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Norma Oficial Mexicana. NOM-062-ZOO-1999. Especificaciones técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. CDMX, México: Diario Oficial de la Federación; 2001 junio. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=762506&fecha=22/08/2001#gsc.tab=0

Sherwin C, Christiansen S, Duncan I, Erhard H, Lay D, Mench J, et al. Guidelines for the ethical use of animals in applied ethology studies. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2003; 81(3):291–305. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00288-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00288-5

Ángel A, García C, García A, Gutiérrez A, Valencia M, García A. Reproductive potential of the female productive parameters of the suckling piglet of the cerdo pelón mexicano. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios. 2022;8(3):2776. doi: 10.19136/era.a8n3.2776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a8n3.2776

Valarezo F. Evaluación de parámetros productivos y reproductivos en cerdos criollos de diferentes biotipos, en la quinta experimental punzara [tesis de licenciatura]. Loja, Ecuador: Universidad Nacional de la Loja: 2023.

Roelofs S, Meijera E, Baas V, Dobrovolski M, van der Staay F, Nordquist R. Neurological functioning and fear responses in low and normal birth weight Piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2019;220:104853. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104853

Feldpausch J, Jourquin J, Bergstorm J, Bargon J, Bokenkroger C, Davis D, et al. Birth weight threshold for identifyng piglets at risk for preweaning mortality. Translational Animal Science. 2019;3(2):633–640. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz076

Bruun T, Ostrup E, Kyed K, Dall J, Varmlose A. Effect on increasing dietary methionine-to-lysine ratio during early gestation on fetal development and piglet birth weight. Animal Reproduction Science. 2023;252:107251. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2023.107251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2023.107251

Sumya K, Young-Jo C, In Ho K. Effect omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in salmon oil on the production performance of lactating sows and their offspring. Korean Journal of Agriculture Science. 2021;48(2):191–199. doi: 10.7744/kjoas.20210002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20210002

Huguet G, Puig-Parnau I, Serrano J, Martin-Gari M, Rodríguez-Palmero M, Moreno-Muñoz J, et al. Hippocampal neurogenesis and Arc expression are enhanced in high-fat fed prepubertal female pigs by a diet including omega-3 fatty acids and Bifidobacterium breve CECT8242. European Journal of Nutrition. 2023;62:2463–2473. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03165-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-023-03165-1

Salazar VS. Factores que afectan la vitalidad de los lechones al momento del nacimiento. Nutrición Animal Tropical. 2018;12(1):40–58. doi: 10.15517/nat.v12i1.33670.

Salamanca-Carreño A, Parés-Casanova PM, Vélez-Terranova OM, Castro RC, Jáuregui R. Valoración morfométrica de una población de cerdos araucanos (Colombia). Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú. 2022;33(5):e23795. doi: 10.15381/rivep.v33i5.23794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v33i5.23794

Quesnel H, Resmond R, Merlot E, Pere M, Gondret F, Louveau I. Physiological traits of newborn piglets associated with colostrum intake, neonatal survival and preweaning growth. Animal. 2023;17(6):100843. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100843

Nguyen H, Peerapol S. Risk factors associated with stillbirth of piglets born from oxytocin-assisted. Vet World. 2020;13-10:2172–2177. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.2172-2177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.2172-2177

Hansen C, Hales J, Amdi C, Moustsen V. Intrauterine growth-restricted piglets defined by their head shape have impaired survival and growth during the suckling period. Animal Production Science. 2018;59(6):1056–1062. doi: 10.1071/AN17581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17581

Suescun-Ospina S, Bolívar-Sierra A, Colmenares-Ayala A. Desempeño productivo, características de la canal y calidad de la carne de cerdos mestizos “casco de mula” en ceba, Orinoquia. 2022;26(2):e779, doi: 10.22579/20112629.779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.779

Mohajan D, Kumar H. Ponderal index: an important anthropometric indicator for physical growth. Journal of Innovations in Medical Research. 2023;2(6):15–19. doi: 10.56397/JIMR/2023.06.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/JIMR/2023.06.03

Bonnet A, Bluy L, Gress L, Canario L, Ravon L, Sécula A, et al. Sex and fetal genome influence gene expression in pig endometrium at the end of gestation. BMC Genomic. 2024;25:303. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10144-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10144-1

Paredes M, Vallejos L, Mantilla J. Efecto del tipo de alimentación sobre el comportamiento productivo, características de la canal y calidad de la carne del cerdo criollo negro cajamarquino. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú. 2017;28(4):894–903. doi: 10.15381/rivep.v28i4.13879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v28i4.13879

Ocampo R, Martínez P, Tobón J. Comportamiento productivo y características de la canal del cerdo criollo colombiano San Pedreño. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú. 2025;36(01):e27373. doi: 10.15381/rivep.v36i1.27373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v36i1.27373

Lyderik K, Madsen J, Larsen C, Pedersen M, Kjeldsen N, Williams A, et al. An increased weaning age and liquid feed enhances weight gain compared to piglets fed dry feed pre-weaning. Animal. 2023;17(5):100801. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100801

Ángel-Hernández A, García-Munguía C, Morales-Flores S, García-Munguía A, Martínez-Alba M. Reproductive potential of female mexican hair pig for use in the current swine culture in México. Brazilian Journal of Aniimal and Enviromental Research. 2024;7(2):1–10. doi: 10.34188/bjaerv7n2-044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv7n2-044

Faccin J, Laskoski F, Cemin H, Mellagi A, Bernardi M, Ulguim R, et al. Evaluating the impact of weaning weight and growth rate during the first week post weaning on overall nursery performance. Journal of Swine Health and Production. 2020;28(2):70–78. doi: 10.54846/jshap/1138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54846/jshap/1138

Fordyce A, Hines E, Edwards E, Plaengkaeo S, Stalder K, Colpoys J, et al. Measuring birth weight and umbilical cord diameter at birth to predict subsequent performance in swine. Translational Animal Science. 2021;5(1):214. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa214

Buchallik S, Kiene F, Buchallik J, Marahrens H, Ossowski N, Schumacher C, et al. Relationship between body condition score, body weight and body measurements in alpacas. Irish Veterinary Journal. 2024;77(1). doi: 10.3390/ani11010102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-024-00274-z

Vanden H, Ayuso M, Aerts P, Prims S, van Cruchten S, van Ginneken C. Glucose and glycogen levels in piglets that differ in birth weight and vitality. Heliyon. 2019;5(9):e02510. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02510

González-Añover P, Encinas T, Torres-Rovira L, Pallares P, Muñoz-Frutos J, Gomez-Izquierdo E, et al. Ovulation rate, embryo mortality and intrauterine growthretardation in obese swine with gene polymorphisms for leptin and melanocortin receptors. Theriogenology. 2011;75(11):34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.07.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.07.009

Bidarimath W, Tayade C. Pregnacy and spontaneous fetal loss: a pig perspective. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2017;84:856–869. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22847

De las Heras A. Factores individuales y nutricionales que determinan la homogeneidad y los rendimientos productivos en porcino ibérico [tesis doctoral]. Madrid, España: Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 2023.

Van Genneken C, Ayuso M, van Bockstal L, van Cruchten S. Preweaning performance in intrauterine growth-restricted piglets: characteristics and interventions. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2023;90:697–707. doi: 10.1002/mrd.23614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23614