Main Article Content
Veterinaria México OA
Cite this as:
- Torres CG, Laytte-García MJ, Tadich-Gallo TA. Perceptions of small animal practitioners and pet owners on professional competencies in veterinary practice: an essential component for curricula design. Veterinaria México OA. 2019;6(4). doi: 10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2019.4.683.
Veterinary schools are responsible for defining their curricula in accordance with societal needs. For this input, listening to stakeholders from outside academia is essential. The aim of this study was to investigate the perception of Chilean small animal practitioners and pet owners on the attributes they consider that constitute a good veterinarian, and to relate these attributes to demographic characteristics. For this, a cross-sectional survey study was designed. A group of 308 small animal practitioners and 328 pet owners from Santiago Metropolitan Region, in Chile, were surveyed. The survey included twenty attributes and questions on demographic characteristics and was applied via email to professionals, and to pet owners sitting in waiting rooms of small animal practices. The majority of respondents in both groups were young adult females. Significant differences in the importance given to 12 out of 20 attributes were found between groups. When asked to prioritize three attributes, both groups mentioned “knowledge about veterinary medicine and surgery”, followed by “recognizes own limitations and knows when to seek advice” as well as “good communication skills” in the case of veterinarians. In the case of pet owners, “confidence”, “recognizes own limitations” and “knows when to seek advice” were the following attributes. Results showed significant differences within groups according to gender and age, with females and elder respondents giving higher importance to the attributes included in the study. Professional skills should be considered when developing new curricula in Chile, especially those important for local stakeholders.
2. Lewis RE, Klausner JS. Nontechnical competencies underlying career success as a veterinarian. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;222:1690-6.
3. Royal College of Veterinary Science (RCVS). RCVS Day one competences. RCVS Setting veterinary standards 2014. Available at: http://www.rcvs.org. uk/document-library/day-one-competences/day-one-competences-updat¬ed-26-march-2014.pdf
4. World Organisation For Animal Health (OIE). OIE recommendations on the competencies of graduating veterinarians Day 1 graduates to assure national veterinary services of quality. PVS Pathway, 2012. Available at: http://www.oie. int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Support_to_OIE_Members/Vet_Edu_AHG/DAY_1/ DAYONE-B-ang-vC.pdf
5. Willis NG, Monroe FA, Potworowski JA, Evans BR, Smith JE, Andrews KJ, et al. Envisioning the future of veterinary medical education: the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges Foresight Project, Final report. J Vet Med Educ. 2007;34:1-41.
6. Taylor JJ. Perfil profesional del Médico Veterinario en Latinoamérica, visión al 2030. Asociación Panamericana de Ciencias Veterinarias y Federación Panamericana de Facultades y Escuelas de Ciencias Veterinarias, 2013. Available at: http://www.panvet.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Perfil-MV_2013.pdf
7. Mossop LH. Is it time to define veterinary professionalism? J Vet Med Educ. 2012;39:93-100.
8. Kogan LR, Mcconnell SL, Schoenfeld-Tacher R. Gender differences and the definition of success: male and female veterinary students’ career and work perfor¬mance expectations. J Vet Med Educ. 2004;31:154-60.
9. Mellanby RJ, Rhind SM, Bell C, Shaw DJ, Gifford J, Fennell D, et al. Perception of clients and veterinarians on what attributes constitute “a good vet”. Vet Rec. 2011;168:616.
10. Schull DN, Morton JM, Coleman GT, Mills PC. Final-year student and employer views of essential personal, interpersonal and professional attributes for new veterinary science graduates. Aust Vet J. 2012;90:100-4.
11. Intendencia Metropolitana. Información geográfica. 2016. Available at: http:// www.intendenciametropolitana.gov.cl/informacion_geografica_2.html
12. Schull DN, Morton JM, Coleman GT, Mills PC. Veterinary students’ perception of their day-one abilities before and after final year clinical practice-based training. J Vet Med Educ. 2011; 38:251-61.
13. Calderón-Amor J, Luna-Fernández D, Tadich T. Study of the levels of human-human and human-animal empathy in veterinary medical students from Chile. J Vet Med Educ. 2017;44:179-86.
14. Tinga CE, Adams CL, Bonnet BN, Ribble CS. Survey of veterinary technical and professional skills in students and recent graduates of a veterinary college. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001;219:924-31.
15. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Schaeffer DJ. Frequency of use of various procedures, skills, and areas of knowledge among veterinarians in private small animal exclusive or predominant practice and proficiency expected of new vet¬erinary school graduates. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004;224:1780-7.
16. Clarke PM, Al-Alawneh J, Pitt RE, Schull DN, Coleman GT. Client perspectives on desirable attributes and skills of veterinary technologists in Australia: considerations for curriculum design. J Vet Med Educ. 2015;42:217-31.
17. Doucet MY, Vrins A. The importance of knowledge, skills, and attitude attributes for veterinarians in clinical and non-clinical fields of practice: A survey of licensed veterinarians in Quebec, Canada. J Vet Med Educ. 2009;36:331-42.
18. Jackson L, Ervin H, Gardner P, Schmitt N. Gender and the internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles. 2001;44:363-79.
19. Smith G. Does gender influence online survey participation? A record linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. San José, CA: San José State University, Faculty Publications. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 501717. 21pp. 2008.
20. Haldane S, Hinchcliff K, Mansell P, Baik C. Expectations of graduate communication skills in professional veterinary practice. J Vet Med Educ. 2017;44:268-79.
21. Rhind SM, Baillie S, Kinnison T, Shaw DJ, Bell CE, Mellanby RJ, et al. The transition into veterinary practice: opinions of recent graduates and final year students. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:64.
22. Foschi M, Freeman S. Inferior performance, standards and influence in same sex dyads. Can J Behav Sci. 1991;23:99-113.
23. Foschi M, Lai L, Sigerson K. Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Soc Psychol Quart. 1994;57:326-39.
24. Eckardt-Erlanger AC, Tsytsarev SV. The relationship between empathy and personality in undergraduate students’ attitudes toward non-human animals. Soc Anim. 2012;200:186-90.
25. Williams B, Brown T, Mckenna L, Boyle MJ, Palermo C, Nestel D, et al. Empathy levels among health professional students: a cross sectional study at two universities in Australia. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014;5:107-13.