Cow-calf management practices in Mexico: Dual-purpose cattle

Main Article Content

Dr. Lassala
Dr. Alonso-Díaz
Dr. Corro-Morales
Dr. González-Padilla
Carlos G. Gutiérrez

Abstract

This study characterized management practices of dual-purpose (DP) cattle production systems across Mexico through a structured questionnaire answered by 996 farmers. The predominant cattle type in DP operations was European dairy × Zebu crossbreeds (54.7 %). However, the prevalence of these cattle varied between regions, being most common in the tropics, with 78 % and 56 % in the humid and dry tropics, respectively. In contrast, farmers in temperate climates prefer European beef × Zebu crossbreeds (63.1 %). Weaned calves and dairy products were the primary goods produced by DP systems. More operations sell raw milk in temperate climates than in arid and tropical regions (P < 0.05). Ninety-one percent of DP farms milk their cows manually, while only 8.6 % use mechanical milking. Cows are milked once daily in 93 % of farms. The main calf-rearing system involves allowing the calf to suckle (95.1 %), with only 4.9 % of operations using artificial methods. Milk letdown was most frequently induced by the calf (73.2 %), but 13.9 % of operations used oxytocin stimulation. Only 6.3 % of operations had milk cooling systems. Regarding sanitary practices, 73.5 % of farms clean cow teats prior to milking. Teat dipping after milking was low (10.5 %), owing to the calf feeding on remnant milk. Also, only 18 % of DP operations routinely perform mastitis tests. Given the importance of dual-purpose systems for local economies, improvements in market integration, technical assistance, and technology adoption are crucial for the future development of this sector.

Keywords:
cattle farming, technology appropriation., market integration, ., oxytocin, manual milking

Article Details

References

González-Quintero R, Barahona-Rosales R, Bolívar-Vergara DM, Chirinda N, Arango J, Pantévez HA, Correa-Londoño G, et al. Technical and environmental characterization of dual-purpose cattle farms and ways of improving production: a case study in Colombia. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice. 2020;10(19):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13570-020-00170-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-020-00170-5

Ruiz C, García LA, Ávila CH, Brunett L. Sustentabilidad financiera: el caso de una empresa ganadera de bovino de doble propósito. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios. 2008;22:503–515. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14102206

Rojo-Rubio R, Vázquez-Armijo JF, Pérez-Hernández P, Mendoza-Martínez GD, Salem AZ, Albarrán-Portillo, et al. Dual-purpose cattle production in Mexico. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2009;(41):715–721. doi: 10.1007/s11250-008-9249-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9249-8

González-Padilla E. Presentación y resumen (PDF). In: Red de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica para la Ganadería Bovina Tropical, editor. Estado del Arte sobre Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica en Ganadería Bovina Tropical. 2nd edition. Mexico City, MX. pp. 20–43. https://redgatro.fmvz.unam.mx/docs/Estado_arte.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Global Dairy Platform, and IFCN Dairy Research Network. Dairy development’s impact on poverty reduction. Chicago, Illinois, US: FAO, GDP, and IFCN; 2018.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Ganadería: Existencias de Bovinos por Función y Actividad Zootécnica. Economía y Sectores Productivos. 2019. https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/ganaderia/#Tabulados; and https://www.cuentame.inegi.org.mx/economia/primarias/gana/default.aspx?tema=e

Federación Colombiana de Ganaderos. Inventario Ganadero. Bogotá, CO; 2022. https://www.fedegan.org.co/estadisticas/inventario-ganadero

González-Padilla E. La producción primaria de la leche en México: mitos, realidades y retos. In: MP Milke García, A Fárres González Saravia, editors. Primer Foro Internacional de la Leche y la Salud. Mexico City, MX: Comisión Ejecutiva Bovinos Leche; 2016. pp. 33–48.

Espinosa García JA, Góngora González SF, García Martínez A, Cervantes Escoto F, Moctezuma López G, Mancilla Rendón ME, et al. Aspectos socioeconómicos de la ganadería tropical (PDF). In: Red de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica para la Ganadería Bovina Tropical, editor. Estado del Arte sobre Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica en Ganadería Bovina Tropical. 2nd edition. Mexico City, MX: 2018. https://redgatro.fmvz.unam.mx/docs/Estado_arte.pdf

Secretaría de Economía. Análisis del Sector Lácteo en México [PDF]. Ciudad de México, MX: Dirección General de Industrias Básicas. 2012. https://www.economia.gob.mx/files/comunidad_negocios/industria_comercio/informacionSectorial/analisis_sector_lacteo.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Gateway to dairy production and products. Rome, IT; 2023. https://www.fao.org/dairy-production-products/production/production-systems/en/

Hemme T, Otte J. Status and prospects for smallholder milk production: a global perspective (PDF). Rome, IT: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2010. http://www.fao.org/3/i1522e/i1522e.pdf

Espinosa JA, Veléz A, Cuevas V, Góngora SF, Vázquez R, Rivera JA. Evaluation of (sic.)impact on (sic.)productivity and profitability of technology in the bovine system of double purpose (sic.)of the Mexican tropic. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 2018;21(2):261–272. doi: 10.56369/tsaes.2411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.2411

Cuevas-Reyes V, Rosales-Nieto C. Caracterización del sistema bovino doble propósito en el noroeste de México: productores, recursos y problemática. Revista MVZ Córdoba. 2018;23(1):6448–6460. doi: 10.21897/rmvz.1240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1240

Granados-Rivera LD, Quiroz-Valiente J, Maldonado-Jáquez JA, Granados-Zurita L, Díaz-Rivera P, Oliva-Hernández J. Caracterización y tipificación del sistema doble propósito en la ganadería bovina del Distrito de Desarrollo Rural 151, Tabasco, México. Acta Universitaria. 2018;28(6):47–57. doi: 10.15174/au.2018.1916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2018.1916

Rangel J, Perea J, De-Pablos-Heredero C, Espinosa-García JA, Toro P, Feijoo M, et al. Structural and technological characterization of tropical smallholder farms of dual-purpose cattle in Mexico. Animals. 2020;10(1):86. doi: 10.3390/ani10010086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010086

Aguilar J, Aguilar CE, Guevara F, Galdámez J, Martínez FB, Arias MA, et al. Classification and characterization of family cattle farming systems of the Frailesca region of Chiapas, Mexico, considering the contribution of cattle raising to family income. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 2023;26(1):1-12. doi: 10.56369/tsaes.4131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4131

González-Padilla E, Lassala A, Pedernera M, Gutierrez C. Cow-calf management practices in Mexico: farm organization and infrastructure. Veterinaria México OA. 2019;6(3):1–17. doi: 10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2019.3.677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2019.3.677

United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Beef Cow-Calf Management Practices in the United States. Beef 2007–08 [internet]. Washington, DC, US; 2008. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/monitoring-and-surveillance/nahms/nahms_beef_cowcalf_studies.

VSN International. Genstat for Windows, 22nd edition. Hemel Hempstead, UK; 2022.

García, E. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Koppen. 5th edition. Ciudad de México, MX: Instituto de Geografía, UNAM; 2004. 92 pp.

Consejo Nacional de Población. Índice de Marginación Municipal. Ciudad de México, MX; 2013. http://www.conapo.gob.mx/es/CONAPO/Indices_de_ Marginacion

McDowell RE. Crossbreeding in tropical areas with emphasis on milk, health, and fitness. Journal of Dairy Science. 1985;68(9):2418–2435. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)81118-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)81118-8

Magaña-Monforte JG, Ríos-Arjona G, Martínez-González JC. Los sistemas de doble propósito y los desafíos en los climas tropicales en México. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal. 2006;14(3):105–114.

Mrode R, Ojango JMK, Okeyo AM, Mwacharo JM. Genomic selection and use of molecular tools in breeding programs for indigenous and crossbred cattle in developing countries: current status and future(sic.) prospects. Frontiers in Genetics. 2018;9:694. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00694

Lassala A, Hernández-Cerón J, Pedernera M, González-Padilla E, Gutierrez CG. Cow-calf management practices in Mexico: reproduction and breeding. Veterinaria México OA. 2020;7(1):1–15. doi: 10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2020.1.839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2020.1.839

Albarrán-Portillo B, Rebollar-Rebollar S, García-Martínez A, Flores-Najera G, García-Vázquez Z. Socioeconomic and productive characterization of dual-purpose farms oriented to milk production in a subtropical region of Mexico. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2015;47:519–523. doi: 10.1007/s11250-014-0753-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0753-8

Martínez LD, Caamal I, Pat LA, Pérez A, Torres GP, Anguebes F. Impacto de los cambios en el ingreso sobre la demanda de carnes en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 2019;10(3):511–523. doi: 10.29312/remexca.v10i3.1241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i3.1241

Loera J, Banda J. Industria lechera en México: parámetros de la producción de leche y abasto del mercado interno. Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas. 2017;19(4):419–426. doi: 10.18271/ria.2017.317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18271/ria.2017.317

Juárez-Barrientos JM, Herman-Lara E, Soto-Estrada A, Ávalos-de la Cruz DA, Vilaboa-Arroniz J, Díaz-Rivera P. Tipificación de sistemas de doble propósito para producción de leche en el Distrito de Desarrollo Rural 008, Veracruz, México. Revista Científica. 2015;25(4):317–323. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=95941173007

Pulido-Albores AR. Evaluation of the impact of a technology transfer programme on dual-purpose cattle production systems in Veracruz, Mexico [PhD. thesis]. London, UK: Imperial College, University of London; 2001.

Kebebe E. Bridging technology adoption gaps in (sic.)livestock sector in Ethiopia: An innovation system perspective. Technology in Society. 2019;57:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.002

González-Sedano M, Marín-Mejía B, Maranto MI, Leme de Magalhães-Labarthe AC, Alonso-Díaz MA. Effect of residual calf suckling on clinical and subclinical infections of mastitis in dual-purpose cows: epidemiological measurements. Research in Veterinary Science. 2010;89(3):362–366. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.04.002

Kivaria FM, Noordhuizen JPTM, Kapaga AM. Risk indicators associated with subclinical mastitis in smallholder dairy cows in Tanzania. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2004;36:581–592. doi: 10.1023/B:TROP.0000040935.87175.bb. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TROP.0000040935.87175.bb

Mdegela RH, Kusilika LJM, Kapaga AM, Karimuribo ED, Turuka FM, Bundala A, et al. Prevalence and determinants of mastitis and milk-borne zoonoses in (sic.)smallholder dairy farming sector in Kibaha and Morogoro districts in Eastern Tanzania. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B. 2004;51(3):123–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00735.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00735.x

Karimuribo ED, Fitzpatrick J, Bell CE, Swai ES, Kambarage DM, Ogden NH, et al. Clinical and subclinical mastitis in smallholder dairy farms in Tanzania: risk, intervention, and knowledge transfer. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2006;74(1):84–98. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.01.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.01.009

Margerison JH, Preston TR, Phillips CJC. Restricted suckling of tropical dairy cows by their own calf or other cows’ calves. Journal of Animal Science. 2002;80(6):1663–1670. doi: 10.2527/2002.8061663x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8061663x

Fröberg S, Aspegren-Güldorff A, Olsson I, Marin B, Berg C, Hernández C, et al. Effect of restricted suckling on milk yield, milk composition, and udder health in cows and behaviour and weight gain in calves, in dual-purpose cattle in the tropics. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2007;39:71–81. doi: 10.1007/s11250-006-4418-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4418-0

Mejía CE, Preston TR, Fajersson P. Effects of restricted suckling versus artificial rearing on milk production, calf performance, and reproductive efficiency of dual-purpose Mpwapwa cattle in a semiarid climate. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 1998;10(1):Article-8. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd10/1/meji101.htm.

Galina CS, Rubio I, Basurto H, Orihuela A. Consequences of different suckling systems for reproductive and productivity of cattle in tropical conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2001;72(3):255–262.doi: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00115-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00115-0

McCracken JA, Custer EE, Lamsa JC. Luteolysis: a neuroendocrine-mediated event. Physiological Reviews. 1999;79(2):263–323. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.2.263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1999.79.2.263

Lammoglia MA, Domíngez BD, Alarcón A, Cabrera A, Daniel AI. Effects of routine oxytocin injection to induce milk ejection on some reproductive parameters of crossbred cows in the tropics of Veracruz. Annual Research & Review in Biology. 2015;6(5):297–303. doi: 10.9734/ARRB/2015/15902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2015/15902