Comparison of udder health and sanitary quality in bulk tank milk from cows manually or mechanically milked
Main Article Content
Abstract
THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY WAS TO COMPARE UDDER HEALTH AND MILK QUALITY IN A BULK TANK IN TWO GROUPS OF COWS OF SMALL HERDS. THE FIRST WITH 14 COWS MILKED BY HAND (G1) AND THE SECOND WITH 21 MACHINE MILKED COWS (G2). ADEQUATE MILKING PRACTICES WERE APPLIED AND CONTROLLED IN BOTH GROUPS. THE STUDY WAS CARRIED OUT FOR FIVE WEEKS IN A HERD LOCATED IN A DRY TROPICAL REGION OF MEXICO. PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS WAS STUDIED BY CLINICAL EXAMINATION AND BY THE CALIFORNIA MASTITIS TEST IN EACH GLAND. THE MILK'S SANITARY QUALITY WAS STUDIED BY BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND BY DETERMINATION OF ACIDITY OF THE MILK. IN G1, THE MEAN PREVALENCE RATE OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS WAS 57%, INCIDENCE RATE WAS 29 PER ONE HUNDRED WEEKS-COW (8 OF 27), AND PREVALENCE RATE OF CLINICAL MASTITIS WAS 7%. IN G2, THE PREVALENCE RATE WAS 33%, INCIDENCE RATE OF SUBCLINICAL AND CLINICAL MASTITIS WERE 10 PER ONE HUNDRED WEEKS-COW (7 OF 70) AND 0.96 PER ONE HUNDRED WEEKS-COW (1/104), RESPECTIVELY; THUS UDDER HEALTH WAS BETTER IN G2 THAN IN G1 (P<0.05). MEAN VALUES OF BACTERIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WERE: MESOPHILIC MICROORGANISMS 5,130±2,354 FOR G1, AND 7,260±3,393 FOR G2 CFU/ML. BACTERIAL LOAD WAS 1.4 TIMES GREATER FOR G2 THAN FOR G1 (P>0.05). COLIFORM COUNTS FOR G1 AND G2 WERE: 421±286 AND 144±180 CFU/ML, RESPECTIVELY; BACTERIAL LOAD BEING 2.9 TIMES HIGHER IN G1 THAN IN G2 (P<0.05). ACIDITY IN BOTH GROUPS WAS, ON AVERAGE, 1.53 G/L OF LACTIC ACID (P>0.05). IT IS CONCLUDED THAT UDDER HEALTH AND SANITARY QUALITY OF MILK OBTAINED BY MECHANICAL MILK ING WERE BETTER THAN IN COWS THAT WERE MILKED BY HAND.
Keywords:
MASTITIS MILK QUALITY MANUAL AND MECHANICAL MILKING
Article Details
License

Veterinaria México OA by Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
Based on a work at http://www.revistas.unam.mx
- All articles in Veterinaria México OA re published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC-BY 4.0). With this license, authors retain copyright but allow any user to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work, without needing to provide additional permission as long as appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
- By using this license, all Veterinaria México OAarticles meet or exceed all funder and institutional requirements for being considered Open Access.
- Authors cannot use copyrighted material within their article unless that material has also been made available under a similarly liberal license.