Wild and feral mammals in a natural area in Mexico City, Mexico

Main Article Content

Perla María del Carmen Acevedo-Ramírez
Elia Torres-Gutiérrez
José Uriel Gante-Escudero
Aarón Rodríguez-Caballero
Raúl Ulloa-Arvizu
Ygnacio Jiménez-Tinajero
Guadalupe Beberly Hernández-Salinas

Abstract

Mexico City, one of the largest urban areas in the world, continues to expand into natural landscapes, threatening native biodiversity. The Sierra de Guadalupe (SG), a protected mountainous area in the city's northern region, represents a critical refuge for wildlife. However, the presence of feral mammals—particularly domestic species exhibiting wild behavior—poses serious ecological and public health risks. From February 2020 to August 2021, we conducted 20 survey walks and 255 camera-trap days across SG to assess the composition and relative abundance of medium-sized mammals. We identified nine species, with dog (Canis lupus familiaris) (24 %) emerging as the most frequently detected. Behavioral indicators—such as gregariousness, robust body condition, and lack of human proximity—suggested that many dogs exhibited feral characteristics. In contrast, species such as gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) and cacomixtle (Bassariscus astutus) showed lower relative abundances, suggesting potential displacement. Species richness estimation (Chao2) confirmed that all predicted species were recorded. No significant seasonal variation in domestic animal presence was found, but spatial analysis revealed higher abundances near urban-adjacent entrances. Testimonies from local residents corroborated the presence of dog packs and reported incidents of aggression toward people, livestock, and wildlife. Our findings highlight the urgent need for ethical and ecologically informed management strategies to control feral mammal populations. Reducing their abundance will help mitigate zoonotic disease risks and support long-term conservation efforts in urban natural areas.

Keywords:
Feral mammals Urban protected area Camera trap monitoring Species displacement Zoonotic risk Sierra de Guadalupe

Article Details

References

INEGI. México en cifras. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. 2024. https://www.inegi.org.mx.

Secretaría de Desarrollo Agrario, Territorial y Urbano. Programa Nacional de Ordenamiento Territorial y Desarrollo Urbano 2021-2024.. 2021. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/643102/PNOTDU_VERSION_FINAL_28.05.2021-comprimido.pdf

Aguilar AG, Flores MA, Lara LF. Peri-urbanization and land use fragmentation in Mexico City. Informality, environmental deterioration, and ineffective urban policy. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 2022;4:790474. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2022.790474.

Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente. Ciudad de México: Diario Oficial de la Federación;1988. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGEEPA.pdf

Procuraduría Ambiental y del Ordenamiento Territorial. Ley Ambiental de la Ciudad de México. Ciudad de México: Gaceta Oficial de la Ciudad de México; 2024. https://data.consejeria.cdmx.gob.mx/portal_old/uploads/gacetas/1640aeed568985b08f3c4aca9ac2d6f6.pdf

Secretaría del Medio Ambiente. Estrategia para la Conservación y el uso sustentable de la Biodiversidad de la Ciudad de México y Plan de Acción, 2030; 2021. https://www.sedema.cdmx.gob.mx/storage/app/media/DGCPCA/GacetaDel01DeSeptiembre2021.pdf

Ibarra-Meza I, Barrera-Huertas HA, López-López E. Atmospheric pollution assessment using polar graphs and its relationship with the bird community from the Sierra de Guadalupe, Mexico (initial data). Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022;29(41):61711–61728. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20430-8.

Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Lista de las Especies Exóticas Invasoras para México. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación; 2016. https://sivicoff.cnf.gob.mx/ContenidoPublico/Fichas%20tecnicas/PlagasExoticas/Lista%20de%20las%20Especies%20Ex%C3%B3ticas%20Invasoras%20para%20M%C3%A9xico.pdf

Doherty TS, Dickman CR, Johnson CN, Legge SM, Ritchie EG, Woinarski JCZ. Impacts and management of feral cats and dogs. Mammal Review. 2017;42(2):83–97. doi: 10.1111/mam.12080.

Gerhold RW, Jessup DA. Zoonotic diseases associated with free-roaming cats. Zoonoses Public Health. 2013;60(3):189–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01522.x.

Lepczyk CA, Dauphiné N, Bird DM, Conant S, Cooper RJ, Duffy DC, et al. What conservation biologists can do to counter trap-neuter-return: response to Longcore et al. Conservation Biology. 2010;24(2):627–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01426.x.

Loss SR, Will T, Marra PP. The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature communications. 2013;4:1396. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2380.

Cruz A. Fauna feral, fauna nociva y zoonosis. Reserva Ecológica del Pedregal de San Ángel. 2009. http://www.repsa.unam.mx/documentos/Cruz-Reyes_2009_faunas_feral.pdf

Mackenstedt U, Jenkins D, Romig T. The role of wildlife in the transmission of parasitic zoonoses in peri-urban and urban areas. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife. 2015;4(1):71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.01.006.

Mendoza Roldan JA, Otranto D. Zoonotic parasites associated with predation by dogs and cats. Parasites & Vectors. 2023; 16(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05670-y.

Baneth G, Thamsborg SM, Otranto D, Guillot J, Blaga R, Deplazes P, et al. Major Parasitic Zoonoses Associated with Dogs and Cats in Europe. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 2016;155(Suppl 1):S54 74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2015.10.179.

Gobierno de la Ciudad de México (GOCDMX). Programa de Manejo del Área Natural Protegida con cagtegoría de Zona Sujeta a Conservación Ecológica Sierra de Guadalupe. México: Gaceta Oficial de la Ciudad de México; 2016. https://data.consejeria.cdmx.gob.mx/portal_old/uploads/gacetas/0239ee9e006a15977b93fa2e2546a5dd.pdf

Yasuda M. Monitoring diversity and abundance of mammals with camera traps: a case study on Mount Tsukuba, central Japan. Mammal Study. 2004; 29:37–46. doi: 10.3106/mammalstudy.29.37.

Coronel-Arellano H, Lara-Diaz NE. Lopez-Gonzalez CA. Abundancia y densidad de jaguar (Panthera onca) en el APFF Meseta de Cacaxtla, Sinaloa, México. Acta zoológica mexicana. 2017;33(1):116−119. ISSN 2448-8445.

Rovero F, Tobler M, Sanderson J. Camera trapping for inventorying terrestrial vertebrates. Manual on field recording techniques and protocols for all taxa biodiversity inventories and monitoring. The Belgian National Focal Point to the Global Taxonomy Initiative, 2010;8:100–128. https://biblio.naturalsciences.be/rbins-publications/abc-txa/abc-taxa-08/chapter-6.pdf

Chávez C, De La Torre A, Bárcenas H, Medellín RA, Zarza H, Ceballos G. Manual de fototrampeo para estudio de fauna silvestre. El jaguar en México como estudio de caso. Alianza WWF-Telcel, UNAM. Ciudad de México. 2013. https://biblioteca.semarnat.gob.mx/janium/Documentos/Ciga/Libros2013/CD002776.pdf

Silveira L, Jácomo ATA, Diniz-Filho JAF. Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys. Biological conservation. 2003;114(3):351–355. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00063-6.

Coronel-Arellano H, Rocha-Ortega M, Gual-Sill F. Raining feral cats and dogs? Implications for the conservation of medium-sized wild mammals in an urban protected area. Urban Ecosystem. 2021;24:83–94. doi: 10.1007/s11252-020-00991-7.

O’Connell AF, Nichols JD, Karanth KU. Camera traps in animal ecology. 1st ed. Springer, New York. 2011.

Wearn OR, Glover-Kapfer P. Snap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods. Royal Society open science. 2019;6:181748. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181748.

Tobler MW, Powell GVN. Estimating jaguar densities with camera traps: Problems with current designs and recommendations for future studies. Biological Conservation. 2013;159:109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.009.

Álvarez-Castañeda S, Álvarez T, González-Ruiz N. Guía de identificación de los mamíferos de México/Key for identifying Mexican Mammals. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press. 2017.

Hortelano-Moncada Y, Barragán-Saldaña A, Fernández-Reyes J, Cervantes F, Barragán Guerrero L, Gómez-Naranjo M. Mammal species richness and new records in protected natural areas of the northern part of the metropolitan area of the Valley of México. Therya. 2021;12(3):453–461.doi: 10.12933/therya-21-1074

Soria-Díaz L, Astudillo-Sánchez CC, Treviño-Carreón J, Barriga-Vallejo C. Diversity and abundance of mammals of the cloud forest of the northeast of Mexico. Acta Zoológica Mexicana. 2023.39:1−18 doi: 10.21829/azm.2023.3912591.

Feinsinger P. Designing field studies for biodiversity conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2004.

Moreno CE. Métodos para medir la biodiversidad. Zaragoza: M&T – Manuales y Tesis SEA; 2001. 84 p. (Vol. 1).

Colwell RK. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9.1.0. [software]. 2013.

Díaz-Pulido A, Payán Garrido E. Limitaciones de los estimadores no paramétricos. Mastozoología Neotropical. 2012;19(1):107–118.

Jiménez-Valverde A, Hortal J. Evaluating the effect of environmental variables on species richness estimates. Ecography. 2003;26(4):441–450.

Morrone JJ. Regionalización biogeográfica y evolución biótica de México: encrucijada de la biodiversidad del Nuevo Mundo. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2019;90 e902980. doi: 10.22201/ib.20078706e.2019.90.2980

Halffter G, Ezcurra E. ¿Qué es la biodiversidad? In Halffter G ed. La diversidad biológica de Iberoamérica I. México: Acta Zoológica Mexicana, Special Volume. 1992. Volumen Especial. p. 4.

Guerrero M. Pérdida de biodiversidad en el Valle de México. Gaceta Ecológica UNAM. 2014;7(1):45–52.

Daniels TJ, Bekoff M. Feralization: The making of wild domestic animals. Behavioural Processes. 1989;19(1–3):79–94 doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(89)90032-6.

Göttert T, Perry G. Going Wild in the City-Animal Feralization and Its Impacts on biodiversity in urban environments. Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 19;13(4):747.

Slater MR. Understanding issues and solutions for unowned, free-roaming cat populations. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2004;219(5):634–637. doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.1350.1.

Levy JK, Crawford PC. Humane strategies for controlling feral cat populations. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2004;225(9):1354−1360. doi:10.2460/javma.2004.225.1354.

Carrasco-Román E, Medina JP, Salgado-Miranda C, Soriano-Vargas E, Sánchez-Jasso JM. Contributions on the diet of free-ranging dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in the Nevado de Toluca Flora and Fauna Protection Area, Estado de México, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2021; 92: e923495 https://revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio/article/view/3495/2196

Gobierno de la Ciudad de México. Ley de Protección a los Animales de la Ciudad de México, Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal. última reforma 27 de septiembre de 2024. https://data.consejeria.cdmx.gob.mx/images/leyes/leyes/2025/LEY_DE_PROTECCION_Y_BIENESTAR_DE_LOS_ANIMALES_DE_LA_CDMX_1.1.1.pdf

Doherty TS, Dickman CR, Glen AS, Newsome TM, Nimmo DG, Ritchie EG, et al. The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates. Biological Conservation. 2017; 210(Part A): 56−59. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.007.

Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales & Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas. Programa para la atención y manejo de especies exóticas invasoras y ferales en Áreas Naturales Protegidas de competencia federal. García Martínez, M. & Gavito Pérez, F. R. (Eds.). CONANP. 2012. https://simec.conanp.gob.mx/Publicaciones2020/Publicaciones %20CONANP/Parte %202/Estrategias %20Planes %20y %20Programas/2012 %20Programa %20Especies %20Invasoras.pdf

Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Inspección y vigilancia en materia de vida silvestre. 2018. https://apps1.semarnat.gob.mx/dgeia/ibi_apps

Hernández-Silva, D. A., Pulido Silva, M. T., Zuria, I., Gallina Tessaro, S. A. Sánchez-Rojas, G. El manejo como herramienta para la conservación y aprovechamiento de la fauna silvestre: acceso a la sustentabilidad en México. Acta Universitaria. 2018; 28(4), 31–41. doi: 10.15174/au.2018.2171.

Wu D, Gu J. Social mechanisms for integrating community cats into community governance in urban China. PLoS One. 2024. 14;19(8):e0308120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308120.